PENENTUAN JENIS PRODUK HUKUM DALAM PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TENTANG HAK UJI MATERIL (Kajian Terhadap Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Agung 28 P/HUM/2018)

Febriansyah Ramadhan, Sunarto Efendi, Ilham Dwi Rafiqi

Abstract


This study examines the problem of determining the type of legal product from the implementation of the judicial review decision, as in Supreme Court Decision 28 P/HUM/2018. The research method used is normative research, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the discussion are, firstly, there are dissimilarities in forming bodies and types of legal products in the object of testing and implementing decisions. The types of legal products tested are classified as primary legislation that is compiled involving 2 powers (DPRD and the Regent), while the follow-up uses legal products that are classified as subordinate legislation that is formed solely by the Regent. Second, the Regent's Regulation that follows up has no validity, because the Regent is not authorized to independently formulate general and local norms, which do not have a juridical basis in national regulations. The follow-up must use a level product, namely Regional Regulations.


Keywords


Types of Legal Products; Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions; Rights for Material Testing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Jone, Lord Elwyn. The English Legal Heritage. Chicago: Oyez Publishing, 1979.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Ke-5. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Bunga Rampai Hukum: Karangan Tersebar. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1974.

Yamin, Muhamad. Proklamasi Dan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982.

Jurnal

Arifin, Ridwan. “Legal Reform Discourse in Indonesia And Global Context: How Does the Law Respond to Crime.†Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 2 (2020): 193–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i2.37057.

Attamimi, Hamid S. “Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 15 (1985): 54–56.

Fadli, Moh. “Peraturan Delegasi Di Indonesia: Ide Untuk Membangun Kontrol Preventif Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah.†In Pidato Pengukuhan Profesor Dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. Disampaikan Pada Rapat Terbuka Senat Universitas Brawijaya, 22. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2020.

M.Monteiro, Josef. “Putusan Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 25, no. 2 (2007): 12–34.

Muabezi, Zahermann Armandz. “Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017): 421–30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.421-446.

Pambudi, Wahyu. “Sakralisasi Pembukaan UUD 1945.†ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sejarah 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v14i1.19401.

Pane, Thorkis. “Kemungkinan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Bawah Undang-Undang Sebagai Obyek Pengujian Mahkamah Konstitusi.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 41, no. 3 (2011): 398. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol41.no3.253.

Plucknett, Theodore FT. A Concise History of the Common Law. Oxford: Butterworth & Co, 1956.

Pope, Herbert. “The Fundamental Law and the Power of the Power of the Court.†Hard Law Review 27, no. 1 (1931): 45–67.

Puspitadewi, Rachmani. “Sekelumit Catatan Tentang Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 1, no. 2006 (24AD): 22–25.

Rahmatullah, Indra. “Rejuvinasi Sistem Chceks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Cita Hukum I, no. 2 (2004): 8–15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.2992.

Siahaan, Maruarar. “Uji Konstitutionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah Dan Tantangan.†Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 4 (2010): 10–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x.

Simanjutak, Enrico. “Kewenangan Hak Uji Materil Pada Mahkamah Agung RI.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 3 (2013): 337–40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.337-356.

Simanjutak, Kardin M. “Impelemntasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Bina Praja 7, no. 2 (2015): 111–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.07.2015.111-130.

Sitompul, Sofyan. “Hak Uji Materiil (Menurut Amandemen UUD 1945 Dan Perbandingan MA Di Amerika Serikat).†Journal Legislasi Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2004): 8–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v1i3.276.

Sukari, Imam. “Asas Contrarius Actus Sebagai Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Berkumpul Di Indonesia.†Mimbar Keadilan 12, no. 2 (2020): 181–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i2.2457.

Sunarto. “Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.†Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 2 (2016): 157–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.157-163.

Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman. “Reformasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Perspektif Konstitusi.†In Problematika Hukum Dan Peradilan, 81. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial, 2018.

Timothy J. Capurso. “How Judges Judega: Theories on Judicial Decision Making.†University of Baltimore Law Forum 29, no. 1 (1998): 34.

Winata, Zaka Firma Aditya dan M. Reza. “Rekonstruksi Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undang Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Negara Hukum 9, no. 1 (2018): 80–90. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.976.

Windarawan, Puguh. “Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga; Fenomena Kekuasaan Ke Arah Constitutional Heavy.†Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (2012): 614–16.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.850

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share