Smart Regulation As A New Approach In Regulatory Reform In Indonesia
Abstract
The regulatory reform hasn’t yet effective results. Because the strategy is still pragmatic and hasn’t addressed root of the problem. Through a conceptual study, it is found that regulatory arrangements in Indonesia still use a centralistic approach, where the government becomes the main subject of regulation and places state regulation as the only instrument. Meanwhile, the smart regulation approach emphasizes the combination of regulatory instruments that not only focus on the centralization of authority in the government but also decentralize it to other non-governmental subjects. The goal is to produce efficient, agile, and egalitarian regulations. The implementation is starting from promoting regulatory decentralization, determining the priority scale for regulatory formation, and establishing a scheme for combining various regulatory instruments
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Buku
Andriani, Henny. “Politik Hukum PerundangUndangan Pada Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Mewujudkan Undang-Undang yang Responsif.” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 45–47. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Ayres, Ian, dan John Braithwaite. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Braithwaite, John. “Types of responsiveness.” In Regulatory Theory, diedit oleh PETER DRAHOS, 117–32. Foundations and applications. ANU Press, 2017. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.15.
Butt, Simon. Regional Autonomy and Legal Disorder: The Proliferation of Local Laws in Indonesia. Sidney: Sidney Law Review, 2010.
Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Menemukan Formulasi Diet Regulasi.” In Strategi perampingan dan harmonisasi regulasi pusat dan daerah, 252–54. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI Bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara-Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2017.
Drahos, Peter, dan Martin Krygier. “Regulation, institutions and networks.” In Regulatory Theory, diedit oleh PETER DRAHOS, 1–22. Foundations and applications. ANU Press, 2017. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.7.
Emadi, Barbara, dan Coffin. Rethingking International Organization: Deregulation and Global Governance. Oxford: Routledge, 2002.
Gunningham, Neil, Peter Grabosky, dan Darren Sinclair. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Gunningham, Neil, dan Cameron Holley. “Next-Generation Environmental Regulation: Law, Regulation, and Governance.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12 (2016): 286–87. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084651.
Gunningham, Neil, Robert A. Kagan, dan Dorothy Thornton. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environmen. California: Stanford University Press, 2003.
Gunningham, Neil, dan Darren Sinclair. “Smart regulation.” In Regulatory Theory, diedit oleh PETER DRAHOS, 133–48. Foundations and applications. Canberra: ANU Press, 2017.
Hauerstein, Kai. “Context and Analysis: Twenty Years of Regulatory Reform.” In Regulatory Reform in Indonesia A Legal Perspective, 14. Jakarta: Hanns Seidel Foundation Indonesia, 2019.
Heldeweg, Michiel A., dan René J.G.H. Seerden. Environmental Law in the Netherlands. Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
Indrayati, Rosita. “Urgensi Harmonisasi dan Sinkronisasi Sebagai Bentuk Penguatan dan Peningkatan Kualitas Regulasi di Indonesia.” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 331–33. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Lawton, Raymond W. Deregulation or Reregulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and The United States. New York: St. Martin’s, 1990.
Madril, Oce. “Executive Review in the Efforts to Structure Regulations in Indonesia.” In Regulatory Reform in Indonesia A Legal Perspective, 173–74. Jakarta: Hanns Seidel Foundation Indonesia, 2019.
Massicotte, Louis. “Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice.” Canadian Parliamentary Review, 2013, 15.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Perihal Menata Regulasi.” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 539–40. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Rees, Joseph V. Reforming the Workplace: A Study of Self Regulation in Occupational Safety. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.9783/9781512809541.
Scott, Colin. “The regulatory state and beyond.” In Regulatory Theory, diedit oleh PETER DRAHOS, 265–88. Foundations and applications. ANU Press, 2017. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.25.
Wiratraman, Herlambang P. “Penataan Regulasi, Teori dan Kritiknya.” In Strategi Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi Pusat dan Daerah, 227–40. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI Bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara-Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2017.
Wood, Stepan, dan Lynn Johannson. “Six Principles for Integrating Non- Governmental Environmental Standards into Smart Regulation.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 46, no. 2 (2008): 361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1197.
Zubaidy, Anang. “Reformasi Regulasi Melalui Reformulasi Perencanaan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 489. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
B. Artikel
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya dalam Sistem Perundang-undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 9, no. 1 (2020): 17–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.389.
———. “Reformasi Regulasi untuk Penguatan Substansi dan Prosedur Pembentukan Peraturan PerundangUndangan (Telaah Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011).” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 353. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Farida Azzahra, Aloysius Eka Kurnia, dan Delanie Arestha Swondy. “Prospek Penerapan Kombinasi Instrumen Hukum, Instrumen Ekonomi, Dan Self Regulation Dalam Upaya Pengelolaan Sampah Plastik Pada Usaha Ritel Di Indonesia.” Padjadjaran Law Review 8, no. 2 (2020): 1–14.
Grabosky, Peter. “Beyond Responsive Regulation: The Expanding Role of Non-State Actors in The Regulatory Process.” Journal Regulation and Governance 2, no. 3 (2012): 2.
Gunningham, Neil. “Enforcement and Compliance Strategies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, diedit oleh Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, dan Martin Lodge, 131. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560219.003.0007.
Haines, Fiona. “Regulatory Reform In Light of Regulatory Character: Assessing Industrial Safety Change in The Aftermath of the Kader Toy Factory Fire in Bangkok, Thailand.” Social and Legal Studies 12, no. 4 (2003): 468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663903012004003.
Pambudi. S, Rilo, Oksep Adhayanto, dan Pery Rehendra Sucipta. “Lembaga Tunggal Pengelola Regulasi: Dasar Pemikiran Dan Tawaran Implementasinya Dalam Ketatanegaran Indonesia.” Veritas et Justitia 7, no. 2 (2021): 431–58. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i2.4237.
Ridwan. “Eksistensi dan Urgensi Peraturan Menteri dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Sistem Presidensial.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2021): 842–43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1845.
Simabura, Charles. “Penataan Produk Hukum Daerah dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah.” In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia, 152–53. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Susanti, Bivitri. “Menyoal Jenis dan Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Jentera 1, no. 2 (2017): 142–43.
Uz Zaman, Muhamad Nafi, Retno Saraswati, dan Ratna Herawati. “Analisis dan Evaluasi Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri Terhadap Peraturan Daerah Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Journal 9, no. 2 (30 April 2020): 400. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2020.26893.
Wibisana, Andri G. “Instrumen Ekonomi, Command And Control, Dan Instrumen Lainnya: Kawan Atau Lawan? Suatu Tinjauan Berdasarkan Smart Regulation.” Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan 4, no. 1 (2019): 175. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v4i1.104.
Wijaya, Viona. “Perubahan Paradigma Penataan Regulasi di indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 10 (2021): 167–86. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.712.
Winata, Muhammad Reza, dan Ibnu Hakam Musais. “Menggagas Formulasi Badan Regulasi Nasional Sebagai Solusi Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 10, no. 2 (2021): 317–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.709.
C. Internet
Government of Canada. Implementation Plan for Smart Regulation. Ottawa: Government of Canada., 2005. tbs-sct.gc.ca/media/ ps-dp/2005/0324-eng.asp.
Heriani, Fitri Novia. “Mengintip Simplifikasi Regulasi di Tahun 2016.” HukumOnline.com, 18 April 2017. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengintip-simplifikasi-regulasi-di-tahun-2016-lt58f6059199534/.
Hidayat, Rofiq. “Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan?” HukumOnline.com, 2018. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perlu-lembaga-tunggal-untuk-menata-pembentukan-peraturan-perundang-undangan-lt5bd4474e732c3/.
Humas Setkab RI. “Daftar Tautan 49 Aturan Pelaksana UU Cipta Kerja.” Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia, 21 Februari 2021. https://setkab.go.id/daftar-tautan-49-aturan-pelaksana-uu-cipta-kerja/.
Kominfo. “Presiden: Fokus Pemerintah Saat Ini Deregulasi dan Pembangunan Infrastruktur.” Kominfo, 30 Maret 2016. https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/7184/presiden-jokowi-fokus-pemerintah-saat-ini-adalah-deregulasi-dan-pembangunan-infrastuktur/0/berita.
Kustiasih, Rini. “RUU Ketahanan Keluarga Tidak Mendesak.” Kompas.id. 22 September 2020. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2020/09/22/ruu-ketahanan-keluarga-dinilai-tidak-mendesak.
Kuwado, Fabian Januarius, Jesica Carina, dan Rakhmat Nur Hakim. “Atasi Tumpang Tindih Regulasi, Jokowi Akan Bentuk Pusat Legislasi Nasional.” Kompas.id, 17 Januari 2019. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/01/17/21041881/atasi-tumpang-tindih-regulasi-jokowi-akan-bentuk-pusat-legislasi-nasional.
Nugraheny, Dian Erika. “Pakar: Tak Perlu Ada Pusat Legislasi Nasional.” Republika, 29 Oktober 2019. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/q04wl6428/pakar-tak-perlu-ada-pusat-legislasi-nasional.
Rizki, Mochamad Januar. “Menilik NFT dalam Asas Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan.” HukumOnline.com. 22 Maret 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menilik-nft-dalam-asas-hukum-jaminan-kebendaan-lt623aca03541af/.
Sahbani, Agus. “Permenkumham Harmonisasi Peraturan Dinilai Konflik dengan UU.” HukumOnline.com, 2 November 2018. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/permenkumham-harmonisasi-peraturan-dinilai-konflik-dengan-uu-lt5bdc39c5d3a98/?page=2.
TrendTech Indonesia. “5 Komunitas NFT di Indonesia.” TrendTech Indonesia, 8 September 2022. https://trendtech.id/5-komunitas-nft-indonesia/.
Zhafira, Arnidhya Nur. “PKHAKI dan ICCA resmi didirikan guna dukung perkembangan kripto.” Antara News. 1 April 2022. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2795933/pkhaki-dan-icca-resmi-didirikan-guna-dukung-perkembangan-kripto.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v13i1.1594
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
